Hundreds of thousands of sanction decisions last year have resulted in unemployed people being knocked off the claimant count.
There were almost 320,000 decisions to stop a person’s Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) benefit for “not actively seeking employment” in 2013.
And in the first six months of 2014 a further 125,000 sanctions have been applied, according to the latest figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
The DWP says the claimant count “includes all cases of claimants who are serving sanctions, provided the claimant continues to keep their claim live during the sanction period.”
However, this is not true for anyone sanctioned for “not actively seeking employment,” as their claims are ended by the DWP.
Dr David Webster, Senior Research Fellow at the University of Glasgow said:
“The most common reason for JSA sanctions is ‘not actively seeking work’, which does not mean what it says but that the claimant has not done exactly what they were told by their Jobcentre adviser, often for reasons beyond their control.”
The claimant commitment
To be considered “actively seeking employment” people must prove they are doing everything in the new claimant commitment.
Claimants have been told to apply for any jobs, including jobs they are not qualified for and would have no chance of getting in order to meet their claimant commitment.
Evidence submitted to the recent Oakley review into sanctions included many examples of people being unfairly sanctioned for this reason.
Examples include:
- A single mother whose benefits (including her housing benefit) were stopped after it was decided she was “not actively seeking work.” She was under a training programme with a major retailer at the time.
- An unemployed man in Scotland was sanctioned for “not actively seeking work” while he was at the bedside of his three month old son who was seriously ill in hospital following kidney failure.
Dr Webster said:
“The impact of the massive increase in this type of sanction under the Coalition has been multiplied by the huge increase in the length of penalty.
“Up to October 2012 the penalty was disentitlement, which lasted only until the claimant recomplied, which could be within a few days. Now there is always a 4-week loss of benefit for a first offence, and 13 weeks for a second.”
A version of this article was first published on NatalieLeal.blogspot.co.uk
I am about to become one of those figures. I am not married but live with a partner who was left in difficulties after his wife left him. We’re not married. I lost my job last year and have suffered illness (cancer) over much of that time. I am stable now and wanted to find a job though I know because of the above factors it will be hard to get one (employment gaps and illness are not great indicators for future employment!)
I have been told that my contributions have run out and my partner should now provide for me. I have worked for more than three decades, and I wonder how this can be possible.
I am wondering about self-employment but have limited assets as due to health issues have been forced into temporary, part-time work. The jobcentre seems to offer no help these days to get work for people with limited options such as me. It’s much, much worse than it used to be.
I think they are only interested in providing statistics that will get the current politicians back in power. It all seems so dishonest and destructive. If only the people knew how they are achieving their figures.